Uploaded image for project: 'Fluid Infusion'
  1. Fluid Infusion
  2. FLUID-5294

Review ambiguous status of "value" and "input" which are both acceptable as input for a standardInputTransform

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-5293 was caused by an ambiguity in the framework about the proper naming of the input of a standardInputTransform. Both "input" and "value" are acceptable for the value itself, but "valuePath" was not acceptable, even though it is issued in two places in the framework -
      i) fluid.transforms.linearScale.invert,
      ii) fluid.singleTransformToFull

      The fix for FLUID-5293 restored consistency by properly aliasing valuePath, but we should review whether we really want this ambiguity since it increases the complexity of tools which will parse and operate on model transformation documents. We should probably settle on one choice and eliminate the other.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                antranig Antranig Basman
                Reporter:
                antranig Antranig Basman
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: